Comments on Harris' “Comments on Rapoport's Comments”Howard, Nigel · Psychological Reports · 1969

Comments on Comments on Comments: A Reply to Margenau and WignerHilary Putnam · Philosophy of Science · 1964

Comments on Comments on Comments: A Reply to Margenau and WignerPutnam, Hilary · Philosophy of Science · 1964

Comments on Grimble's comments on Stein's comments on rolloff of H/sup infinity / optimal controllersKrause, J.M. · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 1992

Mathematics, Matter and Method (Philosophical Papers) || Discussion: comments on comments on comments: a reply to Margenau and WignerPutnam, Hilary · 1979

Some comments on Hapke's commentsThomas Gehrels · 1966

Comments on Rochester's commentsYoshio Kubo · 1981

Comments on the CommentsROBERT S. SUMMERS · 2007

Parliament, the Executive and the CourtsColin T. Reid · The Cambridge Law Journal · 1986

Nature Conservation OrdersReid, Colin T. · Journal of Environmental Law · 1992

CommentReid, Colin T. · Statute Law Review · 1986

Wildlife Reforms in ScotlandReid, Colin T. · Environmental Law Review · 2010

The Polish Code of Administrative ProcedureReid, Colin T. · Review of Socialist Law · 1987

The Polish OmbudsmanReid, Colin T. · Review of Socialist Law · 1988

Parliament, The Executive and the CourtsReid, Colin T. · The Cambridge Law Journal · 1986

Codifying the Law of Criminal EvidenceDennis, I. · Statute Law Review · 2014

Gender Neutral Drafting: Historical PerspectivePETERSSON, S. · Statute Law Review · 1998

A Taxonomy of Constitutional ArgumentsYap, P. J. · Statute Law Review · 2014

Concurrent Legal Interpretation versus Moderate IntentionalismWalshaw, C. · Statute Law Review · 2014

Dworkin's Empire strikes back!Angelo Corlett, J · Statute Law Review · 2000

Constitutional GuaranteesLaws, S. J. · Statute Law Review · 2008

Parliamentary Scrutiny of Community LegislationDENZA, EILEEN · Statute Law Review · 1993

Differential draftingSt JN Bates, T · Statute Law Review · 2000