海量图书期刊资源,随时随地畅享阅读乐趣
Objectivity in historical perspectivePeter Dear; Ian Hacking; Matthew L. Jones; Lorraine Daston; Peter Galison · 2012
Letters to the EditorJan Bondeson, Dennis Todd, William C. Waterhouse, Peter Pesic and Peter Dear · Isis · 1999
Letters to the EditorBondeson, Jan; Todd, Dennis; Waterhouse, William C.; Pesic, Peter; Dear, Peter · Isis · 1999
Why was Copernicus a Copernican?Barker, Peter; Dear, Peter; Christianson, J. R.; Westman, Robert S. · Metascience · 2014
Author’s responsePeter Dear · 1997
The birth of scienceDear, Peter · 2007
Horizontal explanation in the enlightenmentPeter Dear · 2012
Reply to Andrew CunninghamPeter Dear · 2001
The History of Molecular BiologyReview by: Edward Yoxen · The British Journal for the History of Science · 1978
Books receivedThe British Journal for the History of Science · 2005
Aristotle's Subordinate SciencesMcKirahan, Richard D. · The British Journal for the History of Science · 1978
Books receivedThe British Journal for the History of Science · 2010
Action and Reaction before NewtonRussell, John L. · The British Journal for the History of Science · 1976
Uranus ObservedAustin, R. H. · The British Journal for the History of Science · 1967
A Medieval Objection to “Ptolemy”Kren, Claudia · The British Journal for the History of Science · 1969
Uniform Acceleration, Space, and TimeDrake, Stillman · The British Journal for the History of Science · 1970