Taming Intuition (How Reflection Minimizes Partisan Reasoning and Promotes Democratic Accountability) || Measuring Individual Differences in Reflection
- 作者Arceneaux, Kevin; Vander Wielen, Ryan J.
- 期第3期
- 文件大小2074.07KB
- 发表时间2017
- DOI10.1017/9781108227643.004
- 页码46-87
Taming Intuition (How Reflection Minimizes Partisan Reasoning and Promotes Democratic Accountability) || ReferencesArceneaux, Kevin; Vander Wielen, Ryan J. · 2017
The Effects of Need for Cognition and Need for Affect on Partisan EvaluationsKevin Arceneaux and Ryan J. Vander Wielen · Political Psychology · 2013
Strategic Candidate Entry and Congressional Elections in the Era of Fox NewsArceneaux, Kevin; Dunaway, Johanna; Johnson, Martin; Vander Wielen, Ryan J. · American Journal of Political Science · 2019
The Effects of Need for Cognition and Need for Affect on Partisan EvaluationsArceneaux, Kevin; Vander Wielen, Ryan J. · Political Psychology · 2013
The Influence of News Media on Political Elites: Investigating Strategic Responsiveness in CongressArceneaux, Kevin; Johnson, Martin; Lindstädt, René; Vander Wielen, Ryan J. · American Journal of Political Science · 2016
Taming Intuition (How Reflection Minimizes Partisan Reasoning and Promotes Democratic Accountability) || Measuring Individual Differences in ReflectionArceneaux, Kevin; Vander Wielen, Ryan J. · 2017
Taming Intuition (How Reflection Minimizes Partisan Reasoning and Promotes Democratic Accountability) || Democratic Accountability and the “Rational” CitizenArceneaux, Kevin; Vander Wielen, Ryan J. · 2017